Sangguniang Bayan Sessions Should be Open to the Public
Manito’s Time
members were supposed to observe the session of the Sangguniang Bayan
(SB) last August 9, 2017. However, we were prevented from doing so
by the Administrative Assistant III, Madam
Luisa Calsiña.
We are still at a loss why we were not allowed inside the Session
Hall.
Hindi
pinapasok upang makapagmasid ng sesyon ng Sangguniang Bayan ang
Manito’s Time.
The
Constitution states that the Philippines is a Democratic and
Republican State.
The
Democratic system allows
government for the people and by the people where citizens can take
part in making decisions and determining policies.
The
main feature of Republicanism,
on the other hand, is representation.
Democracy
makes sure that the will of the people is implemented by the
government. It is impractical for each and every citizen to directly
participate in legislative discussions. That is why democracy gave
birth to republicanism’s representative government. Each and every
citizen cannot debate and vote so we elect a few who will represent
us. Hence, we have our Sanggunian Bayan.
Sa
sistema ng Republikansimo,
hindi praktikal na magdesisyon ang lahat ng mamamayan kaya pumipili
sila, ayon sa Konstitusyon, ng mga kinatawan. Iyan ang rason kung
kaya’t tayo ay may Sangguniang Bayan.
Because
of this impracticality we delegate to our SB members the task of
making local ordinances and resolutions. They sit and do this task
in our stead, as our chosen representatives. We, the citizens, at
the very least, are given the opportunity to directly observe
deliberations.
This
is why the law itself directs that Sangguniang Bayan Sessions shall
be open to the public. The general rule is that the people should
not be prevented from attending the sessions. This is not a mere
option granted to the Council, much less to a single administrative
officer.
Ayon
sa batas, karapatan ng mga mamayan na makadalo o makapagmasid sa mga
sesyon ng Sanggunian.
Sec.
52 (c) of the Local Government Code of 1991 provides:
“All Sanggunian
sessions shall be open to the
public unless a closed-door
session is ordered by an affirmative vote of a majority of the
members present, there being a quorum, in the public interest or for
reasons of security, decency, or morality…”
“Lahat
ng sesyon ng Sanggunian ay bukas sa publiko maliban kung
napagdesisyonang magkaroon ng pribadong sesyon matapos pagbotohan ng
karamihan sa mga miyembrong nasa sesyon, at kapag may quorum, sa mga
kadahilanang pangseguridad, DECENCY, o moralidad…”
The
law provides an exception to the rule -- that a closed-door session
may be ordered -- but only upon “affirmative vote of the majority
of the members present” and only for the reasons stated. That is,
for reasons of security, decency, or morality”.
Again,
we do not know if it is the practice of Manito’s Sangguniang Bayan
to violate the right of the people to public sessions by ordering
administrative officers to prevent the public from observing the SB
sessions. We would like to think that the answer is in the negative.
Perhaps
the incident was only due to unclear instructions or lack of
knowledge by an administrative officer. In any case, the Sangguniang
Bayan needs to clarify policies to staff so that they would not
unknowingly frustrate the mandate of our Democratic and Republican
State.
Editorial, Manito's Time; August 30, 2017
Post a Comment